On the japanese plains of Colorado, in a county of lower than 6,000 individuals, Lincoln Well being runs the one hospital inside a 75-minute drive. The ability struggles financially, given its small dimension and the realm’s tiny inhabitants.
However for over a decade, the Hugo, Colorado-based well being system has remained afloat partially because of a stunning supply: particular taxes on the state’s hospitals.
The taxes Lincoln pays assist cowl the state’s Medicaid prices and — as a result of the federal authorities matches a portion of what states spend on Medicaid — allow Colorado to say extra federal cash. That usually results in extra {dollars} for the hospital. The tax proceeds even have helped Colorado broaden Medicaid below the Reasonably priced Care Act to cowl 400,000 extra low-income adults, considerably decreasing the variety of individuals displaying up at hospital doorways with out insurance coverage.
Final yr, Lincoln paid $500,000 in supplier taxes however netted greater than $3.6 million further from Medicaid, accounting for about 15% of its finances, mentioned Lincoln CEO Kevin Stansbury.
“These {dollars} enable me to look after sufferers who’re enrolled in Medicaid and to interrupt even moderately than lose cash,” he mentioned. “With out them, it will considerably influence our means to outlive.”
Each state besides Alaska makes use of at the least one supplier tax to spice up its federal Medicaid {dollars}.
However Republicans who management Congress are searching for potential cuts within the practically $900 billion Medicaid program to assist fund an extension of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts — and have sought to painting supplier taxes as malicious, generally even deriding them as “cash laundering.” Lawmakers say they might curtail or eradicate supplier taxes as a part of laws to enact Trump’s home agenda.
“It’s infuriating,” Stansbury mentioned.
Medicaid and the carefully associated Kids’s Well being Insurance coverage Program collectively cowl roughly 79 million low-income and disabled individuals and are collectively financed by states and the federal authorities.
Federal {dollars} match state funds with no restrict. Whereas the cut up varies primarily based on a state’s per capita revenue, the federal match ranges from 50% to 77% for youngsters, pregnant girls, and other people with disabilities, who make up many of the enrollment.
States began utilizing supplier taxes within the Eighties to assist pay their share and achieve further Medicaid funds from the federal authorities.
Brian Blase, a former Trump well being coverage adviser who leads the conservative Paragon Well being Institute, sees supplier taxes as one of many highest types of waste in Medicaid. States and their hospitals, nursing properties, and different suppliers aren’t held accountable for the way the tax cash is used, decreasing incentives for states to manage Medicaid spending, he mentioned.
“This has been a characteristic of this system for 4 a long time, and it’s a characteristic that’s getting worse,” Blase mentioned.
The Congressional Finances Workplace estimates eliminating supplier taxes would save the federal authorities greater than $600 billion over a decade.
Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), who chairs the Home committee that oversees Medicaid, has mentioned supplier taxes are on the menu for potential cuts.
Different adjustments Republicans are contemplating to chop federal Medicaid spending embody requiring grownup enrollees to show they’re working as a situation of eligibility, in addition to ending greater funds for adults enrolled as a part of the Reasonably priced Care Act’s enlargement of this system.
Since 2014, greater than 20 million nondisabled adults in 40 states and Washington, D.C., have gained protection below the enlargement.
Home Republicans have set a Memorial Day deadline to return to an settlement on spending cuts, which might assist pay for extending about $4 trillion in tax cuts handed throughout Trump’s first administration and set to run out on the finish of this yr.
The Authorities Accountability Workplace and the Medicaid and CHIP Cost and Entry Fee, a congressional advisory board, have raised considerations in regards to the supplier taxes, which successfully saddle federal taxpayers with state bills. Republican and Democrat presidents have criticized or proposed curbing using Medicaid supplier taxes — together with Trump in his first time period, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden whereas serving as vice chairman.
However opposition from hospitals, nursing properties, and states snuffed out any transfer to restrict or finish the preparations.
Colorado and different states usually use the cash to take care of or enhance funds to suppliers, which are sometimes paid much less by Medicaid than by Medicare, the federal program primarily for individuals 65 or older, or personal insurers.
States have added supplier taxes to assist generate federal cash to deal with financial downturns and finances constraints.
Hospitals in Idaho final yr started paying an extra supplier tax to extend pay to hospitals and home- and community-based suppliers. The tax got here as Idaho’s Republican-controlled legislature sought so as to add many situations that threatened to finish the state’s Medicaid enlargement — which might additionally eradicate a key supply of elevated federal funding.
Brian Whitlock, president and CEO of the Idaho Hospital Affiliation, mentioned funding from the hospital tax helps enhance Medicaid funds to about 80% of Medicare’s charges as an alternative of 60%.
“We nonetheless lose cash on each Medicare and Medicaid affected person,” he mentioned. “The state acknowledges that this cash helps offset the losses we take below Medicaid reimbursement.”
Whereas hospitals and nursing properties have been the primary beneficiaries of supplier tax proceeds, ambulance companies have additionally paid and benefited from Medicaid taxes. States more and more have additionally accredited Medicaid taxes on personal insurers that function their Medicaid applications to achieve extra federal funds.
California’s Medicaid managed care tax started in 2009 and is predicted to generate practically $9 billion in web income for the 2024-25 fiscal interval — or about 5% of the state’s Medicaid finances, in keeping with the California Legislative Analyst’s Workplace.
Lately, California has prolonged full Medicaid protection to immigrants missing everlasting authorized standing. Federal legislation prohibits federal Medicaid {dollars} from getting used to cowl individuals within the nation with out authorization, however states can use their very own cash.
At a presentation to congressional staffers in April, Blase cited California’s technique for instance of supplier tax abuse and claimed the state is successfully laundering federal funds to cowl individuals residing within the U.S. with out authorization.
In apply, the tax has been a form of fiscal strain valve usually offsetting state spending. A poll measure that handed in November now requires that a lot of the cash from California’s tax particularly be used to extend Medicaid reimbursement to medical doctors, hospitals, and different suppliers.
Hospital officers and state Medicaid leaders argue the time period “cash laundering” is an inaccurate approach to describe supplier taxes, since they’re allowed by federal legislation. However Blase mentioned calling the levies a “tax” is deceptive, declaring that almost all companies don’t sometimes advocate to pay one.
Jamie Whitney, chief authorized officer for Texas-based Adelanto HealthCare Ventures, a consulting agency, mentioned that supplier taxes are a politically impartial means to assist states pay for Medicaid and that curbing their use would hurt all of them. “This isn’t a red-state, blue-state subject,” she mentioned.
Colorado is considered one of greater than a dozen states which have funded an ACA Medicaid enlargement utilizing supplier tax cash. Others embody Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.
Colorado applied its Medicaid supplier tax effort in 2009. Within the 2024 fiscal yr, about $5 billion of the state’s $15 billion Medicaid program was funded by supplier taxes, in keeping with the state.
The cash helps the state pay greater Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals, which reduces their must cost greater charges to non-public insurers, mentioned Kim Bimestefer, govt director of the Colorado Division of Well being Care Coverage and Financing, which oversees Medicaid.
A few of the further funds are depending on hospitals assembly sure high quality and patient-safety metrics, reminiscent of decreasing readmission charges after sufferers are discharged — a requirement state officers say improves care for everybody.
The supplier taxes additionally fund a program permitting working residents with disabilities to purchase into Medicaid protection even when their revenue is as excessive as 300% of the federal poverty stage, or $46,950 for a person. About 20,000 persons are enrolled in this system.
Amongst them is Alison Sbrana, 31, of Fort Collins, Colorado, who has a kind of power fatigue syndrome and depends on Medicaid to cowl long-term residence care.
“It could be devastating if the profit went away,” mentioned Sbrana, who works as a researcher and activist for these with the identical dysfunction. “I’d be pressured to cease working to maintain my revenue low sufficient to qualify.”
The state’s supplier taxes additionally pay for a $60 million fund to help rural hospitals, serving to them add telehealth companies, recruit surgeons, and rent paramedics, in keeping with a state report.
Konnie Martin, CEO of San Luis Valley Well being, a two-hospital system primarily based in Alamosa, Colorado, mentioned her nonprofit paid $5.4 million in supplier taxes final yr and gained about $15 million in advantages from greater Medicaid funds and the agricultural grants.
She mentioned the cash helps her hospital preserve obstetrical companies, so residents don’t should drive 120 miles to the closest maternity hospital. With out the birthing middle, your complete area would endure, she mentioned.
“It additionally would intestine the economic system of the group, as a result of younger individuals will transfer away,” she mentioned.
KFF Well being Information senior correspondent Bernard Wolfson contributed to this report.
